Twenty Years Later …

Do you remember the days following 9.11.2001? 

Days filled with sadness and confusion were followed by days filled with patriotism and love of country.  We came together as Americans to mourn our dead, to despise our enemies and to lift up our country and defend its freedoms.  What has happened to America since then?  

We are all now subjected to the sometimes overzealous scrutiny of the TSA when we travel; we are criticized for being ‘Islamophobic’ if we express fear of Muslims, who aren’t trying to hide the fact that they want to kill Christians and Jews; we are called “racist” if we object to Muslims trying to impose their beliefs upon our culture; we are encouraged to embrace diversity even when it poses a threat to our well-being; we are ridiculed if we express patriotism, gratitude to our military and law enforcement; and we are now expected to accept the dishonoring of our flag, the symbol of our liberty, as “freedom of speech” and civil protest.

What will it take to restore the patriotism that has energized this country over the past 250 years?  The patriotism that fueled us to fight international battles against tyranny is fading.  It is being drowned out by the voices and actions of those who want to destroy America, who want to “fundamentally change” America.  

I fear that it will take another even more catastrophic event to restore America’s patriotism.  After all, other than TSA and Homeland Security, what effects are left seventeen years later?  Today’s college students didn’t know our world before 9/11, they were unborn or maybe toddlers then.   Many adults who experienced that day have forgotten how horrifying it was and choose to push the memory away.  That is why, seventeen years later, we have a growing number of Muslims running for political office – and winning!  They are taking their oaths of office with their hands on the Quran, not the Bible.  

We need to remember 9.11.2001, not brush it away to the basement of history. 

God Bless America!

Linda Sauer

Senate Dem’s Throw a Tantrum

The U.S. Senate is getting as bad as British Parliament!   When I have had the opportunity to see the British Parliament in action I have been appalled at the lack of decorum that is demonstrated by the members.  Shouting and interrupting and basically behaving like rowdy schoolchildren, it seemed to be a miracle that they ever got anything done.  Well, today during the first day of hearings for the confirmation of Brett Kavanaugh’s nomination to the Supreme Court I saw even worse behavior by our elected representatives.  Let me be specific about that:  by our elected Democratic senators.

Repeatedly interrupting the Chairman of the Judiciary Committee during his opening remarks, Kamala Harris (who wants to run for President) was the epitome of a shrill, attention-seeking, power-mad politician whose parents never taught her common courtesy.  She was shamelessly pandering for the cameras and was an embarrassment to women, Democrats and just plain human beings.  And she wasn’t the only one:  just about every time Democratic Senators got the microphone they launched into vitriolic diatribes that produced poisonous clouds of hot air that I swear were almost visible in the room.

Furthermore, I think it is despicable that each of the Democratic members of the committee said they had already decided to vote against the confirmation of Judge Kavanaugh.  If they have already made up their minds, why are they pushing for the release of more documents that they won’t read because they’ve already made up their minds?  Gee, is it another ploy to delay the process?  How stupid do they think we are?

As the days of the confirmation hearing play out, pay attention to the words and actions of the members of the Judiciary Committee.  And then judge them by their actions and words.  These people are swamp-dwellers and they clearly demonstrate what is wrong with this country today.  by Linda Sauer

The Bible, The Quran, and The US Congress

More Muslims than ever are running for political office this year. The Associated Press reported in July this year that 100 Muslims are running for federal and state positions in the current election cycle and nearly half made it through the primaries. Many more are running for seats on local planning boards, school boards and other positions at the local and county level. 

A large number of Muslim candidates appear a positive development for many people, especially those on the Left. After all, they’re Americans and have every right to run for office. As one person recently said to me, “They’re just like you and I and have every right like we do”. On the surface that is correct. The question is are they just like you and me?

It cannot be denied that Islam has a long-standing and recognizable plan to take over America and replace its Constitution. The Muslim Brotherhood is the Author of the Explanatory Memorandum that outlines its plan to take over America by what it called ‘a Civilization Jihad’. The Muslim Brotherhood is a designated terrorist group in 7 nations, including the country where it was founded, Egypt. Civilization Jihad means from within. Gaining political office would be one way to achieve its objectives. 

There are several Muslim Brotherhood front organizations that are set up to provide support to the growing list of Muslim political candidates. Organizations such as the United States Council of Muslim Organizations (USCMO), Project Mobilize, Jetpac, and Emgage. The USCMO, a political party for Muslims and the first religion-based political party in U.S. history, formalized its commitment to Muslim candidates at its founding in 2014. Conspicuously absent from the USCMO website are references to U.S. laws or a pledge to uphold the Constitution.  Instead, featured prominently is this statement: “The Council places premium importance on defining the common good based on the Quran and the model of the Prophet (P.B.U.H.), and coordinating a cooperative striving among Muslims and their institutions to implement that common good in America.” Does that sound like they are you and I?

There is a disturbing trend of allowing Muslims to pledge their allegiance at their swearing-in by placing their hand on the Quran and not the Bible. That is a major problem. Nothing in the Quran is compatible with our Constitution. Sharia Law, which is the goal of Islam to introduce wherever they become dominate, is not compatible with the Constitution. That is a problem.

As we approach the November elections and subsequent swearing-in ceremonies in 2019, do you think Muslims should have to swear on the Bible? Write your Congressman as I did and see what they say. It’s a short note, with a simple question. “Will you support a Muslim candidate taking his oath of office by swearing on the Quran?” That’s it. No fanfare. And if you do I hope it turns out better than my letters. I got no answers from two of our Congressman. And the one that did answer wrote a lengthy three paragraph diatribe about supporting conservative causes never mentioning the question I asked.

Around the World of Islam

The Montana Human Rights Council, Soft Landing, Love Lives Here and UM Professor Bitar all sing the praises of ‘peaceful Islam’. Let’s take a quick look at a few headlines from last week.

A report from Sweden says Muslim migrant joblessness is nearly 20%, yet the government calls for even more Muslim migrants. Sounds like the People Republic of Missoula. From Germany, they reported that a Muslim migrant stabbed a Doctor to death in a random attack at his practice. In tragic news closer to home, it was reported that an American couple that believed “evil is a make-believe concept” were murdered by ISIS while bicycling across Tajikistan.

Their actions seem to place reasonable doubt as to their peaceful nature. What do their words say? In Illinois this week it was reported that a Muslim leader said: “Everything we represent goes in total contradiction to what the West represents”. Umm?  News from the land down under reports, “I step on your cross”: Muslim leader in Australia says his group “not required to comply with Australian laws”. Why not?

Back in the states, we venture up to Minnesota where a Muslim Congressional candidate voted against a bill to stop insurance payments to jihadis. Wouldnt it make sense to stop insurance payments to jihadis? Finally, on the ‘homegrown’ front, NBA basketball legend Lew Alcindor, a Muslim convert (his Muslim name is Kareem Abdul Jabbar) says that our national anthem is a slave song. Really? That coming from a multi-millionaire in support of the other ungrateful multi-millionaires in the NFL who won’t stand for our anthem.

The extreme Left is alive and well and working on Montana. They support the people described above and they support them coming to America and setting up shop. They support America becoming a Third World nation as it is transitioned to a socialist state, part of the New World Order.

Stand up now and stop the rot!


Mr. Down-Home Montana??

Democratic Sens. Tim Kaine (Va.), Jay Rockefeller (W.Va.), and Jon Tester (Mont.) have joined a growing list of U.S. senators that have backed extending marriage rights to same-sex couples.

Senator JON TESTER would have us believe he is down-home, on the tractor and Mr. Montana. Is that true? Does someone with Montana values get 80% of their donations and support from outside Montana? Big Jon does?! Makes you wonder.

Does someone representing Montana values rank number 1 in donations from commercial banks, finance, and credit institutions, foreign policy organizations, and lobbyists? Jon Tester does.

He also ranks # 1 in raking in money from livestock (understandable), environmental groups (makes sense) and Indian gaming, which is a no-brainer since he panders to the Montana Tribes.

Big Jon ranks #2 in fundraising from such Montana favorites as Advertising and PR companies, Hedge Funds, Drug Manufacturers, Professional Sports (lots of that under the Big Sky), Textiles, Securities and Investments… just to name just a few.  ‘Mr. Montana’ is a busy man.

Tester only receives 20% of his money from in-state. Missoula leads the way in giving, followed by Billings, then Bozeman, and Helena.

Jon Tester’s Financial Donations

Do YOU still think Tester serves ALL of Montana … think again.

Do YOU believe that Tester didn’t know the voting machines were rigged to guarantee his election win?

As you may have already concluded, Jon Tester is bought and paid for by the Deep State.

What Does It Take to Be a Montanan?

When you listen to Democratic TV ads all you hear is how Gianforte and Rosendale are not Montanans. Really?

When Gianforte ran all they could talk about was how he didn’t know Montana values because he was from the East Coast.

Now we have Rosendale and they claim he doesn’t understand Montana values and has no clue about Native Americans according to Tester.

Think about that for a minute.

Gianforte raised his family here. He built a business here that employed 700 people, and no doubt he’s paid more taxes to our Great State than Tester and Bullock combined. Yet, they say he is no Montanan and has no business leading us?!

Now we hear Rosendale is a ‘Marylander’, God forbid. A developer no less! According to the Left, that makes him clueless on how to manage the land in Montana. Rosendale is a real rancher as opposed to the guy from Big Sandy who poses for pictures on a tractor.

What kind of people single out their opponent for such nonsense. I can tell you who, Leftist Progressives who can run on their records.

The same Leftists in Montana who sing the praises of Wilmot Collins, the newly elected Mayor of Helena. Mr. Collins is from Africa, but somehow he’s suddenly ‘a Montanan’, and rightly so, because he’s been here working and raising a family for twenty years.

The Left is blinded by its own hypocrisy. Time to end the charades.

Fence Sitters

Two wooden mannequin models sitting in conversational poses, perched on a wooden fence, outside in a garden. They are turned towards each other in friendly physical stances, as if talking to each other in a relaxed manner. White flowers in a grassy area can be seen in the background.

Are you as concerned about the current state of our country and our world as I am?  I hope so!   But there is a difference between being concerned and being in a state of anxiety or angst.  

Well-placed concerns can lead to actions by individuals that may help the situation (like launching Last Chance Patriots!).  On the other hand, an overwrought state of anxiety can result in physical and/or mental health problems with very little or no positive outcome. 

Furthermore, I believe that those people whose concerns have reached such a level of intensity that they have lost all ability to think logically have become vulnerable to the numerous well-funded groups that are attempting to orchestrate the destruction of our society.  I’m pretty sure that those folks whose anguished, tearful and sometimes howling faces were all over the television on election night 2020 are now hiding behind Antifa’s black masks or are proudly and loudly marching with professionally printed signs calling for the overthrow of the current administration. 

They have allowed their disappointment in the election process to morph into an intense hatred that has permeated (dare I say “poisoned”?) all social media platforms as well as MSM.  And those are just the public platforms.  How many family dinners or friendly social occasions have been destroyed by what may have started as a casual conversation, or simply a comment, about politics?

So I call on you to “Save a Fence Sitter”.  Don’t worry about the fanatics because they are a lost cause.  And don’t worry about those of us who have our feet firmly planted on the ground with regard to current affairs.  But if you can encourage a rational, thoughtful person who may be too busy to think about the world outside of their home or workplace to wake up to the threats we face today, then you may motivate one more person who will choose to be on the right side of this fight.

Follow by Email